Tuesday, January 24, 2012

The Banner on Cohabitation

On January 23rd, The Banner posted an article on cohabitation. The following is my response to that article. One individual posted the following link in their comments, which I thought was helpful information: 2208 Cohabitation Report, but should not be the basis for our argument against cohabitation. The basis for our argument should be scripture.
Lots of great advice for compromising God’s word! But before that, what’s good about this? This article starts with a few stories to persuade us with emotional dilemmas and ends with urging us to challenge people to delve into Scripture.
There are a number of hints at good responses, but they seem to be peppered in to take off the edge of the response the author is proposing and to appease those who wish a true Biblical view of marriage and co-habitation. There is a gap between the cultural practice and what the Bible (not always church) teaches. There almost always is, in any era and any area of life.
So how should we respond?
  1. Remember the gospel of Christ: We do need to love God and love our neighbor. We need to bear each other’s burdens (Gal 6:2). We all bear our own sins, and are called to build up the body of Christ (Eph 4:16) and restore each other gently (Gal 6:1). Restoring involves repentance.
  2. Teach them God’s purpose in marriage: We should point them, not only to a covenant relationship, but that marriage is an institution of God (not of the state) and illustrates our relationship and salvation through Christ.
  3. Teach them the Biblical qualifications from an early age: Teach them the Biblical qualifications for each partner in their role. Not to be unequally yoked (2 Cor 6:14), the sacrifice of the husband, his washing the wife with the Word, leading in godliness, providing and protecting (Eph 5) and raising up children.
  4. Drop the old arguments: There are always false teachers and false doctrines. There are always negative influences from our culture. Learn the new arguments from the culture and engage the arguments and address them directly with your children. If teaching of God’s law isn’t done from an early age and it gets to the point of co-habitation this looks judgmental rather than helpful. Our ideas and arguments should be shaped by scripture, not the latest studies or situations, those always change and become crumbling sand.
  5. Keep the scare tactics: OK, maybe not quite like that. But, the compromise explained in a couple of the stories show that the individuals fear man, or serve finances, more than the fear and serve the Lord (Prov 9:10).
  6. Strive for God’s standard, and His Word: The arguments in the article forget we have a high standard, while none of us can meet it perfectly; it’s not a race against what could be worse. The author seems to argue that our culture is full of greed and murder, only maiming someone is a step toward love.
  7. Our goal is to save their soul: We certainly hope and pray that those cohabiting will come to repentance. That could look like eliminating the sexual immorality, or it could be recognizing God’s beautiful plan and institution of marriage. Or, in the worst case, it can mean expelling those in sin (1 Cor 5:5) to save their soul.
The culture already has enough other areas where they have influenced the church. Which complaint would you rather hear from your young adults? "I can’t get laid." Or "I can’t find a godly man/woman worthy of my respect and honor." When we follow the culture we create both of these complaints. Shouldn’t we rather bring the culture (as far as it depends on us) under the dominion and rule of Christ? The pagan culture we live in today is a result of the church not doing its job.

1 comment:

Nufey said...

The following is a follow-up based on further comments on the Banner article:

I doubt most conceive of God-ordained marriage in a Biblcial way. We have two factors playing into our inaccurate perceptions. First, our culture and how we conceive it today (your point), and second, looking at it only through historical lens.

When we look at it through a historical lens, we're not going back far enough. For example, when Jesus answers the Pharisees about divorce in Matthew 19 and Mark 10 he refers back to the very beginning in Genesis. Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:24 to be precise. Marriage is an institute of God (not civil) from the very beginning; it was a mistake to ever turn that over to civil authorities. My wife and I are married before God regardless of what the civil authorities say, or have on file.

Marriage in scripture is portrayed as a covenantal relationship, and likewise regulated in that way. This is implied in Matthew 19 & Mark 10 in Jesus response and the Pharisees question. See the question, "Is it *lawful*..." and the response that "give ... a *certificate* of divorce...". These statements imply regulation, Jesus was not quoting Roman law, he was quoting OT scripture. This regulation of marriage and divorce has been around at least since Deuteronomy (24). God often speaks of his relationship with his people also in terms of marriage, adultery, and even divorce (Jer 3:8).

When we speak of cohabitation there is a connotation of not following this covenant, thus living in sin. Most people who cohabit have not followed the path of abstinence before, nor a covenantal relationship; for most it is "let's try this for a while". If you want to argue that some do follow this, but simply lack the formality of a civil marriage license, then you'll need to argue that with some studies and statistics to show that our perceptions are wrong about those who choose to cohabit (not just that it's possible). For those who follow the rest of the law, why would they not take the simple step of declaring their covenant before God and his family (church, not civil)?